Fakhr al-Din al-Razi: Al-Mahsul fi Ilm al Usul;

(The harvest in the science of origins) (d1210)

-------------------------------------------------

Taken from: islamicbook.ws   المحصول في علم الأصول

 

If it is permissible that he does not intend to make us understand the speech, then it is permissible to address in Arabic to the Zinj…………….is permissible, because the Zinj does not give a meaning to the Arab, ……. If it is permissible to address in Arabic to the Zinj and to explain to him after a period of time…………….. If you say the speech of the Zinj, the Arab cannot understand anything of it, so it is not permissible for them to address it ……………. and in that it is equated with the speech of the Zinj because we do not understand anything of it at all……………

 

………….. And between the discourse of the Arab to the Zinj, because there cannot be the purpose of informing the preponderant belief, since nothing of it is understood ………….

 

……… you had better addressed the common name without explaining at once, it would have been better to address the Arabic to the Zinj with ability ……………..  If I tell the difference that the Arab does not understand anything from the Zinj, and here he understands that what is meant is one of the meanings of the name ……………..

 

…………… It is necessary to address the Arabic with the Zinj, because if the Arab knows the language of the Zinj to whom he is addressed, he knows that he has wanted in his speech something, either the matter or the prohibition or something else……………. What matters in a good speech is that the listener is able to know by him what the speech has indicated, ………….., unlike the Arab, he is not able to know what the rhetoric of Zinj is made for him, so the difference is clear and God knows best.